Cases 31 - 40 of 529
Peters v. State of Texas
as 21-40870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Texas, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Dinah Huffman and others
Cruise v. Lumpkin
as 21-20610
Petitioner / Appellant:
Robbie Duane Cruise
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Brockman v. Lumpkin
as 21-11160
Petitioner / Appellant:
Edward Brockman
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Thomas v. Lumpkin
as 21-51128
Petitioner / Appellant:
Corey Cardrey Thomas
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Sazo v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv03825
Petitioner:
Edgar Arturo Sazo and Incorrectly Filed
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. ยง 8888
Walker v. Lumpkin
as 21-40858
Petitioner / Appellant:
Brian Evan Walker
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Perez v. Lumpkin
as 21-40855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roberto Perez
Defendant / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Jamie Martin, N.P., Nurse Practitioner and Michael Bates, Warden
Hunter v. Lumpkin
as 21-20599
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Alexander Hunter
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rice v. Lumpkin
as 21-11149
Petitioner / Appellant:
Reginald Donell Rice
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Barclay v. Lumpkin
as 21-11141
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Curtis Barclay
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
