Cases 31 - 40 of 529
Hinshaw v. Lumpkin
as 21-11168
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher Michael Hinshaw
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Sazo v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv03825
Petitioner:
Edgar Arturo Sazo and Incorrectly Filed
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. ยง 8888
Thomas v. Lumpkin
as 21-51128
Petitioner / Appellant:
Corey Cardrey Thomas
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Cano v. Lumpkin
as 21-11176
Petitioner / Appellant:
Juan Daniel Cano
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Peters v. State of Texas
as 21-40850
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Texas, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Bobby Lumpkin
Rambo v. Lumpkin
as 21-11136
Petitioner / Appellant:
Brian Douglas Rambo
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Chandler v. Lumpkin
as 21-11107
Petitioner / Appellant:
Darvinal Roy Chandler, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Cruise v. Lumpkin
as 21-20610
Petitioner / Appellant:
Robbie Duane Cruise
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Olivarez v. Lumpkin
as 21-40795
Petitioner / Appellant:
George Olivarez
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Gilmer v. Lumpkin
as 21-40837
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joe Marlin Gilmer
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
