Cases 11 - 20 of 2,731
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00142
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jean v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01421
Petitioner:
Joseph F. Jean
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01423
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Briones v. Lumpkin
as 24-10348
Petitioner:
Jose Nieves Briones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Wood v. TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Aaron Blake Wood
Respondent:
TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01387
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Riggs, Sr. v. Lumpkin et al.
as 7:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
James Tyrone Riggs, Sr
Defendant:
Director Bobby Lumpkin, Chairman David G. Gutierrez, Parole Boardmember Elodia Brito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-20160
Petitioner:
Ernesto Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jackson v. Lumpkin
as 24-10332
Petitioner:
Jecole DeKeith Jackson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
