Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,290
Baughman v. Bowman
as 24-40286
Plaintiff: Steven Kurt Baughman
Defendant: Jimmy Bowman, Warden, Powledge Unit, Vernon Mitchel, Assitant Warden, Powledge Unit, Ronnie Stanhope, Lieutenant, Powledge Unit and others
Evans v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00218
Petitioner: Douglas Ray Evans
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kindred v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00219
Petitioner: Herman Lee Kindred
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Padilla v. Lumpkin
as 24-10365
Petitioner: Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Frankenfield v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01560
Petitioner: Brian C Frankenfield
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01546
Petitioner: Johnny Richardson
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brantley v. Lumpkin
as 24-10363
Petitioner: Ross Thomas Brantley, III
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Ortiz v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01608
Petitioner: Anthony Ortiz
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2024cv01506
Plaintiff: Terry Lee Morris
Defendant: Bobby Lumpkin and David Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00150
Petitioner: Antoine Thomas
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?