Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,773
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 24-10362
Petitioner: Joseph Leonard Smith, Jr.
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Conley v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00833
Petitioner: David Ray Conley, III
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2024cv01506
Plaintiff: Terry Lee Morris
Defendant: Bobby Lumpkin and David Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00150
Petitioner: Antoine Thomas
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01514
Petitioner: Michael William Davis
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDonald v. Lumpkin
as 24-40269
Petitioner: Joseph Christopher McDonald
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Frankenfield v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01560
Petitioner: Brian C Frankenfield
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01481
Petitioner: Rymir Phillips
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webb v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01502
Petitioner: Everette Dale Webb
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv01499
Plaintiff: Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant: Lorie Davis, Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?