Cases filed in Texas
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,091
Strieder v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv01065
Petitioner: Karen Marie Strieder
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00090
Petitioner: Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pradia v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01045
Petitioner: Nathaniel Pradia
Defendant: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Vallejo Recio v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00042
Petitioner: Daniel Vallejo Recio
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Delacruz v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00013
Petitioner: Isidro Miguel Delacruz
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitaker v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00994
Petitioner: Ryan Jivaro Whitaker
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weaver v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00238
Petitioner: Joseph Weaver
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strieder v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00283
Petitioner: Karen Marie Strieder
Respondent: Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alonso v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00968
Petitioner: Ralph Ernest Alonso
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nettles v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00980
Petitioner: Donovan Nettles
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?