Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,309
Richardson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01546
Petitioner: Johnny Richardson
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hubert v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00082
Petitioner: Lawrence Israel Hubert
Respondent: Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kindred v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00219
Petitioner: Herman Lee Kindred
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Padilla v. Lumpkin
as 24-10365
Petitioner: Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Herrera v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00440
Petitioner: Carlos Herrera
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brantley v. Lumpkin
as 24-10363
Petitioner: Ross Thomas Brantley, III
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 24-10362
Petitioner: Joseph Leonard Smith, Jr.
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Conley v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00833
Petitioner: David Ray Conley, III
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2024cv01506
Plaintiff: Terry Lee Morris
Defendant: Bobby Lumpkin and David Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00150
Petitioner: Antoine Thomas
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?