Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Robinson v. Henry et al
as 6:2023cv01755
Plaintiff:
Ramone Dayne Robinson
Defendant:
Duane Henry, Kadean Wilson, Trevor Persenaire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boggs v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Boggs
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Godwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gelin v. Boggs et al
as 6:2022cv00791
Plaintiff:
Edson Gelin
Defendant:
Emmett Jackson Boggs, Jr. and Michael A. Drake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Rushing et al
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Medgine Sarah Jean
Defendant:
Karen E. Rushing, Todd Newton, Jeffrey R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Boggs Contracting, Inc. et al v. Bernard Freismuth et al
as 6:2021cv02088
Plaintiff:
Boggs Contracting, Inc., Boggs Materials, Inc., Boggs Transport, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Bernard Freismuth and BSS&K Consulting, Inc.
Verdun v. Smith et al
as 8:2021cv02370
Plaintiff:
Bruce Alan Verdun, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael P. Smith, Brian Morland, Rebecca Angel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boggs v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00228
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Kenneth Martine Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garrett v. Dorony et al
as 8:2019cv00875
Defendant:
Boggs Graphics Equipment, LLC and John Dorony
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Boggs, LLC, et al v. Soltis, et al
as 6:2018cv00687
Plaintiff:
David Boggs, LLC and Mac Mar, LLC
Defendant:
Matthew Soltis and My Affordable Roof, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Boggs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2018cv00148
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Boggs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
