Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Taylor v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00620
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Taylor
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, O.I.C. f/n/u Borden, O.I.C. f/n/u Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Windom v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01269
Defendant:
Keith Harding, Tony Parker, Lee Dotson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronardo L. Windom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borden v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv00499
Plaintiff:
Jason Dean Borden
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Hall, Jr., et al
as 1:2020cv01230
Defendant:
Hilton Hall, Jr. and John Borden
Plaintiff:
Frederick T. Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Windom v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00494
Defendant:
Keith Harding, Tony Parker, Lee Dotson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronardo L. Windom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Gordon et al
as 1:2019cv01171
Defendant:
Terrill Gordon, Bernhard Dietz, John Borden and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ultimate Cakra Liberation et al v. Trinity Food Service et al
as 1:2017cv01190
Plaintiff:
Ultimate Cakra Liberation, Charles Orlando Fields, Robert Birdwell and others
Defendant:
Trinity Food Service, Tennessee Department of Corrections, Trousdale Turner Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Borden et al
as 1:2017cv01091
Plaintiff:
Arthor Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
John Borden and Core Civic Correction Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv02985
Plaintiff:
Earl J. Howard
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Markee Jones, Reginald Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maher v. State of Tenn. et al
as 1:2016cv01314
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Maher, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Dietz, John Borden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
