Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Keeley Abram et al v. City of Los Angeles, California
as 2:2023cv09565
Plaintiff:
Keeley Abram, Robert Aceves, Brian Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, California
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207 Maximum Hours
Tiarra Abell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05038
Plaintiff:
Tiarra Abell, Amelita Armendarez, Thomas Ash and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boswell et al v. Babcock et al
as 4:2020cv06571
Plaintiff:
Joseph Boswell and Gregory Sarlo
Defendant:
Xtreme Healthy Life Styles, Pure Natures Design, Inc. and Michael Babcock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pure Natures Design v. Boswell et al
as 4:2020cv05802
Plaintiff:
Pure Natures Design, Inc. and Pure Natures Design
Defendant:
Greg Sarlo and Joseph Boswell
Counter Defendant:
Michael Babcock and Xtreme Healthy Life Styles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(HC) Boswell v. Foss
as 2:2020cv00798
Petitioner:
Buck Boswell and Buck Edward Boswell
Respondent:
Foss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Buck Edward Boswell v. Foss
as 2:2020cv03469
Petitioner:
Buck Edward Boswell
Respondent:
Foss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Buck Edward Boswell v. Foss
as 2:2020cv03469
Petitioner:
Buck Edward Boswell
Respondent:
Foss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Hard Disk Drive Suspension Assemblies Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2019md02918
Defendant:
Headway Technologies, Inc., NHK Spring (Thailand) Co., Ltd., NHK Spring Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
John R. Shannon III, Christopher Rinehart, Alex Nicholson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Boswell v. Pfizer Inc.
as 3:2019cv04790
Plaintiff:
James Boswell
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
