Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Abdullah v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Shamsiddin Muhammad Abdullah
Defendant:
William Smith, Colonel E. Bowes, Captain L. Dupree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowe v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 1:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Robert Bowe
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grant v. Bowers et al
as 1:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Abdul Grant
Defendant:
Ernest Bowes, Leon Dupree, Tanya Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Bowes v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 4:2020cv00051
Plaintiff:
Sheila Bowes
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, Does 1 through 100 Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mateen v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00620
Defendant:
Ms. Happer, Mr. D/S Collins, B.L. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Khalif Abdul Mateen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitlock v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00621
Defendant:
Ms. Happer, Mr. D/S Collins, B.L. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Waverly Whitlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holley v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00623
Defendant:
Ms. Happer, Mr. D/S Collins, B.L. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Garfield W. Holley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dammones v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00622
Defendant:
Ms. Happer, Mr. D/S Collins, B.L. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dammones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00552
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Perry-Bey et al v. Esper et al
as 2:2019cv00344
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harold, Roy L. Perry-Bey, Clarence Lawson and others
Defendant:
Mark T. Esper, Richard V. Spencer, Robert Wilkie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
