Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sanders v. Renaud et al
as 1:2024cv10165
Plaintiff:
Devon Sanders
Defendant:
Cheryl A. Renaud, Krystle Brown, Amy Boncher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Underwood v. Spencer, et al
as 20-1895
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK HAUGHEY, MICHAEL GRANT, SEAN SMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALENTINE UNDERWOOD
Underwood v. Spencer, et al
as 20-1795
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SWEETS, f/k/a John Doe (Sweets), JACK HAUGHEY, MICHAEL GRANT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALENTINE UNDERWOOD
Jones v. Mitchell, et al
as 20-1195
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, DOUGLAS L. BOWER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD T. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA A. MITCHELL, MICHAEL DEVINE, JOHN F. CAMELO and others
Eiermann v. Bowers et al
as 1:2018cv11762
Defendant:
Lawrence R. Bowers and Lahey Clinic Foundation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joanna M. Eiermann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowers v. Tesaro Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10086
Plaintiff:
Roger Bowers
Defendant:
Tesaro Inc. , Leon O. Moulder, Jr. and Timothy R. Pearson
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Underwood v. Barrett, et al
as 16-1725
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VALENTINE UNDERWOOD
Defendant - Appellant:
PATRICIA BARRETT, ANTHONY CATALANO, JEFFREY CLEMENT and others
Defendant:
DOUGLAS BOWER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SWEETS, f/k/a John Doe (Sweets), DONALD DENOMME and others
Underwood v. Spencer, et al
as 16-1678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VALENTINE UNDERWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
LUIS SPENCER, MICHAEL GRANT, JAMES J. SABA and others
Lauring et al v. Weiss et al
as 4:2016cv40015
Plaintiff:
Lauring, John P. Lauring, Lauring Charitable Foundation and others
Defendant:
Weiss, Lee D. Weiss, Family Endowment Partners, LP and others
Interested Party:
David E. Bower
Trustee:
Fidelity Investments
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
