Cases 1 - 10 of 69
United States of America v. Bowers
as 4:2024mc50285
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
James Bowers
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Duneske v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 4:2023cv11778
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Ann Duneske
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Jeremy Jaskulski, Eli Bowers and others
Bowers #487402 v. Jones
as 1:2023cv00610
Plaintiff:
Jason Kelly Bowers #487402
Defendant:
Unknown Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Willis et al
as 4:2023cv10621
Plaintiff:
Tracy Davis
Defendant:
Robert Willis, Scott Radloff, Monica Kunze and others
Bowers et al v. Danley et al
as 2:2022cv10792
Plaintiff:
Tanisha Bowers, Bryan Scott Kellems and Tanisha Bowers and Bryan Scott Kellems, Next Friends of EK, a minor
Defendant:
MD Leslie Danley, Detroit Community Health Connection Inc, DMC Primary Care Physicians, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Price v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv10662
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Price
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Bower #737557 v. Aiken et al
as 2:2021cv00226
Plaintiff:
Luke Bower #737557
Defendant:
Subrina Aiken, B. Tanes, D. Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers #534365 v. Skipper
as 1:2021cv00768
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Marcelious Antonio Bowers #534365
Respondent:
Gregory Skipper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bowers v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv11542
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc. and Jeffrey P. Bezos
Plaintiff:
James E. Bowers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
