Cases 1 - 10 of 102
WILLIAMS et al v. BOWERS
as 2:2024cv01937
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILLIAMS and MARY JO WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WILLIAM BOWERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
COMMCAB, INC. v. JG BOWERS, INC
as 2:2024cv01269
Plaintiff:
COMMCAB, INC.
Defendant:
JG BOWERS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
D.S. et al v. ARTHUR LOUIS STEEL et al
as 2:2023cv04454
Plaintiff:
D.S.
Defendant:
ARTHUR LOUIS STEEL, DOUGLAS BOWERS, OFFICER JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
CHAMBERS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
EBONY CHAMBERS and ROBERT TAYLOR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELLE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BOWERS v. LOVELL
as 2:2022cv04323
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOWERS
Defendant:
DAMON ROMEL LOVELL
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
BOWERS v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04116
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE BOWERS
Defendant:
LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMERICAN REGENT, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
BOWERS v. EQUUS CAPITAL PARTNERS, LTD. et al
as 2:2022cv03791
Plaintiff:
ERIC LEE BOWERS
Defendant:
EQUUS CAPITAL PARTNERS, LTD., MADISON APARTMENT GROUP and MADISON APARTMENT GROUP, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
