Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bowles v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
James Bowles
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv00442
Defendant:
Kathleen McGarry, Bureau of Prisons, Kenneth Gleria and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lawrence Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowles v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv01135
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
James Bowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Draper et al
as 1:2017cv00711
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael S. Draper, Mary S. Woodward, Lucky 66 Bowl Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jaramillo et al v. Frewing et al
as 1:2017cv00673
Plaintiff:
Rick Jaramillo, Steve Duran, Railyard Brewing Compancy LLC and others
Defendant:
David Frewing, U.S. Bowling Corporation and Craig Dill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
D.R. Horton, Inc. et al v. Angel, et al
as 1:2012cv01286
Defendant:
Ivelisse Cruz, Tracee Edwards, Edward Caulder and others
Plaintiff:
D.R. Horton, Inc. and DRH Southwest Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Prehistoric Pottery Sherds Found At the Hamm Residence Including the Following et al
as 1:2011cv00055
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Prehistoric Pottery Sherds Found at the Hamm Residence Including the Following, Stone Axe, Photos and Negatives of Artifacts (Found in an envelope) and others
Claimant:
Brian Palmer and Barry Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv00951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
