Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Neal v. Lovett, et al
as 23-1033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENARD DARNELL NEAL
Defendant / Appellee:
LOVETT, Warden, M. STARR, Wardeh, DEANTON, Associate Warden and others
Goins v. GEO Lawton Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2022cv01014
Plaintiff:
Jacob Christian Goins
Defendant:
GEO Lawton Correctional Facility, Michael Boyer and Mark Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Boyer
as 5:2022cv03221
Plaintiff:
John Timothy Price
Defendant:
H. Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooley v. Douglas County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2022cv03169
Plaintiff:
Tony Allen Cooley
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff's Department, Jane Carlson, Vince Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Licerio v. Tate et al
as 1:2020cv01420
Defendant:
Elsa Archambault, Arapahoe County Detention Facility, Medical Provider at The Arapahoe County Detention Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Licerio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyer v. USA
as 4:2020cv00031
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Justin Lee Boyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pacheco et al v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv02424
Plaintiff:
Jabez Parker, William Lee, Benjamin Greenfield and others
Defendant:
Mary Carlson, Colorado Department of Corrections, Dean Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales, Jr. v. Boyer et al
as 1:2017cv00658
Plaintiff:
Tony Morales, Jr.
Defendant:
Michelle Boyer, Lianne Lopez, FNU Aires and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Robinson et al
as 1:2016cv01409
Plaintiff:
Nick James Gonzales
Defendant:
David Robinson, FNU Ortiz, G. Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Loya et al
as 1:2016cv01388
Plaintiff:
Nick James Gonzales
Defendant:
FNU Loya, FNU Seaboy, FNU Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
