Cases 1 - 10 of 15
McCarren et al v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv13129
Plaintiff:
Michael David McCarren, Maurice Stewart, Levertis Riley and others
Defendant:
Raphael Washington, Robert Dunlap, Boyer and others
Bounds v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv13078
Plaintiff:
Deshaun Lamar Bounds
Defendant:
Raphael Washington, Mike Jamar, Boyer and others
McCarren et al v. Washington et al
as 4:2023cv12324
Plaintiff:
Michael D. McCarren, Walter L. Galloway, Maurice A Stewart and others
Defendant:
Raphael Washington, Robert Dunlap, Boyer and others
Jeffery Johnson v. Jennifer Briarly, et al
as 23-5741
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER PARKS BRIARLY, OFFICER JOANNA TIPTON, WARDEN ANNA VALENTINE and others
Ewing v. Washington et al
as 4:2022cv12127
Plaintiff:
Darrell Rashard Ewing
Defendant:
Raphael Washington, FNU Allen, FNU Boyer and others
Johnson v. Briarly et al
as 3:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Jennifer Parks Briarly, Officer Tipton, Warden Anna Valentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins #172475 v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Van Jenkins #172475
Defendant:
Livonia Police Department, Patrick Reynolds, Stanley Pollitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyer v. Daviess County Detention Center
as 4:2019cv00077
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Keith Jim Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amar Gueye v. Jeremy Richards, et al
as 15-6325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMAR GUEYE
Defendant - Appellee:
MAGISTRATE JEREMY RICHARDS, JUDGE JOHN SIEVE, HAMILTON COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS COURT and others
Gueye v. Richards et al
as 2:2015cv00178
Plaintiff:
Amar Gueye
Defendant:
Jeremy Richards, John Sieve, Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas Division of Domestic Relations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
