Cases 31 - 40 of 1,458
Dial v. Dichter et al
as 1:2023cv01435
Plaintiff:
Keith Dial
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
Nominal Defendant:
Wheels Up Experience Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Edmond v. Winstead PC Law et al
as 3:2023cv02608
Plaintiff:
Lakeshia Rashawn Edmond, Derrick Edmond, Jordyn Phenice Edmond and others
Defendant:
Winstead PC Law, Experiant, Bellrock Real Estate Partners LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Southern Refuge, LLC v. Bondurant et al
as 2:2023mc00007
Plaintiff:
Southern Refuge, LLC
Defendant:
E. Brad Bondurant and Bond Arch, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Brad SmithIn re: Brad Smith
as 23-13813
Petitioner:
In re: BRAD LAMONT SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rushford v. Cain
as 23-3135
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RUSHFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent
Schmett & Company, Inc. et al v. Jacqulyn R. Stanton et al
as 5:2023cv02111
Plaintiff:
SCHMETT & COMPANY, INC. and dba Brad Schmett Real Estate Group
Defendant:
JACQULYN R STANTON, DEANNA R LANGE and Compass California, Inc.
Jonas et al v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as 0:2023cv03082
Plaintiff:
Monet Jonas, Brad Hoag and Rebecca Froehlich
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Jonas et al v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as MN/0:23-CV-03082
Plaintiff:
Jonas, Monet Jonas, Brad Hoag and others
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica S.A, EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group S.p.A. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
