Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Michael Eaves v. Rodney Ballard, et al
as 21-5754
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EAVES
Defendant:
RODNEY BALLARD, Commissioner, JOHN M. DUNN, Ombudsman, BRANDON LYNCH, Administrative Specialist and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN TOELKE, Classification and Treatment Officer and STEFANEY HUGHES, Unit 1 Administrator
Michael Eaves v. Rodney Ballard, et al
as 21-5670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EAVES
Defendant:
RODNEY BALLARD, Commissioner, JOHN M. DUNN, Ombudsman, BRANDON LYNCH, Administrative Specialist and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN TOELKE, Classification and Treatment Officer and STEFANEY HUGHES, Unit 1 Administrator
Ardeth Finley, Jr.In re: Ardeth Finley, Jr.
as 21-5631
Petitioner:
In re: ARDETH C. FINLEY, JR.
Respondent:
BRAD ADAMS, Warden
Michael Eaves v. Rodney Ballard, et al
as 21-5628
Defendant:
BRANDON LYNCH, Administrative Specialist, JOHN M. DUNN, Ombudsman, JACK GODBEY, Unit II Unit Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EAVES
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN TOELKE, Classification and Treatment Officer and STEFANEY HUGHES, Unit 1 Administrator
Sadler v. Wellpath et al
as 5:2021cv00063
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sadler
Defendant:
Pratul Patel, Angela Clifford, Ashley Vanmeter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dye v. Adams
as 5:2021cv00118
Petitioner:
Eric Dye
Respondent:
Brad Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darryl Grigsby v. Brad Adams
as 21-5225
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD ADAMS, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRYL G. GRIGSBY
Ferguson v. Adams
as 5:2021cv00022
Respondent:
Warden Brad Adams
Petitioner:
Alger Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv13832
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRAD ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
