Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Ninth Amendment Party Association et al v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Ninth Amendment Party Association and Milton Gerard Esquibel
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Clovis Watson, Jr., Scotty Rhoden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DICKS v. WHITEHEAD et al
as 4:2023cv00004
Defendant:
STEPHEN MICHAEL DICKS, SHERIFF BRAD WHITEHEAD and DEPUTY ROBERT FIPPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonio Woodson v. John Burnsed, et al
as 17-11355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO DAMARCUS WOODSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN BURNSED, Sergeant, GEORGE R. HANSON, Captain, KEITH A. MUSSELMAN, Lieutenant and others
Woodson v. Burnsed et al
as 3:2017cv00255
Plaintiff:
Antonio Damarcus Woodson
Defendant:
John Burnsed, George R. Hanson, Keith A. Musselman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Woodson v. William Carey, et al
as 16-16744
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO DAMARCUS WOODSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM H. CAREY, Sergeant, JEFFREY K. LINDSEY, Captain, BRAD WHITEHEAD, Assistant warden and others
Perry v. Jones et al
as 3:2016cv01015
Plaintiff:
Raymond Perry
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Kevin D. Jordan, J. H. Yonn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Woodson v. Michael Johnson, et al
as 16-13370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO DAMARCUS WOODSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL JOHNSON, Sergeant, RIZER, Captioin, WARDEN and others
Antonio Woodson v. Warden, et al
as 16-13278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO DAMARCUS WOODSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, MICHAEL A. HONOUR, JOHN R. MCSPADDEN and others
Woodson v. Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv00638
Plaintiff:
Antonio Damarcus Woodson
Defendant:
Michael Johnson, Rizer, Brad Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodson v. Carey et al
as 3:2016cv00469
Plaintiff:
Antonio D. Woodson
Defendant:
William H. Carey, Jeffrey K. Lindsey, Brad Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
