Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Doss v. Instant Brands, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Darryl Doss
Defendant:
Instant Brands, LLC, Instant Brands, Inc. and Corelle Brands, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
T.K. v. Prime Hydration, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
T.K.
Defendant:
Prime Hydration, LLC, Congo Brands, LLC, Logan Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Baker v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 4:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Doyle Baker
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America and Bel Brands USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Ester v. Yum! Brands, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Karen Ester
Defendant:
Yum! Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Knighten v. Yum! Brands, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
David Knighten
Defendant:
Yum! Brands, Inc., Charter Central, LLC and Charter Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Doss v. Yum! Brands, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Demetra Doss
Defendant:
Yum! Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
