Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Huertas v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
Branden Huertas and Semple
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Stover
as 3:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Branden Smith
Respondent:
R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Peterson v. USA
as 1:2023cv08322
Petitioner:
Branden Peterson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gates v. Toulon, Jr.
as 2:2023cv07599
Petitioner:
Branden Gates
Respondent:
Errol D. Toulon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Menzel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Branden D. Menzel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
United States of America v. Shelton (Ross)
as 23-6401
Defendant:
BUSHAWN SHELTON, HERMAN BLANCO, ARTHUR CODNER and others
Defendant / Appellant:
HIMEN ROSS and Ace
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Clarke et al v. Slutty Vegan, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02570
Plaintiff:
Davaughn Clarke, Latoya Adams and Branden Cook
Defendant:
Slutty Vegan, Inc. and Slutty Vegan ATL LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Henriquez v. Hershey Creamery Company
as 7:2023cv01392
Plaintiff:
Branden Henriquez
Defendant:
Hershey Creamery Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
United States of America v. Shelton (Cummings)
as 23-6122
Defendant:
BUSHAWN SHELTON, HERMAN BLANCO, ARTHUR CODNER and others
Appellant:
JASON CUMMINGS, The Hat and Stacks
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Shelton (Blanco)
as 22-3211
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Bushawn Shelton, AKA Shelz, Arthur Codner, AKA Feddi, AKA Fetty, AKA Feddi Bossgod, AKA Fetty Boss, AKA Scary, Kalik McFarlane and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Herman Blanco, AKA Taliban
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
