Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Whitmore v. Rogers, et al
as 15-6019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBIN WHITMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE ROGERS, KELLI CURRY, CRYSTAL DURFEY and others
Whitmore v. Rogers et al
as 5:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
David Robin Whitmore
Defendant:
Mike Rogers, Kelli Curry, Crystal Durfey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Parker, et al
as 11-6087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PARKER, JIM REED, SHANNON REED and others
Thomas v. Parker et al
as 5:2010cv00308
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Thomas
Defendant:
David Parker, Jim Reed, Shannon Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Parker, et al
as 09-6203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PARKER, RODNEY REDMAN, BECKY GUFFY and others
Thomas v. Guffy, et al
as 09-6204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BECKY GUFFY, DAVID PARKER, DEBBIE MORTON and others
Washington v. Wilson et al
as 3:2009cv00493
Plaintiff:
Jemarcus Washington
Defendant:
Rodney Wilson, Scott Wright, Cheryl Tripplet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chasten v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2009cv00509
Plaintiff:
Janice Chasten
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Eric Franklin, Shaun Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Parker, et al
as 08-6185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY L. THOMAS, AKA Madyun Abdulhaseeb
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PARKER, Warden, Warden, RODNEY REDMAN, Deputy Warden, BECKY GUFFY, Warden's Assistant and others
Defendant:
KATRINA FRECH, CHSA, NURSE CHESTER, R.N., DENNIS COTNER, Medical Services Administrator and others
Thomas v. Guffy et al
as 5:2007cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Thomas
Defendant:
Becky Guffy, David Parker, Debbie Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
