Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nessel v. FKI Hardware, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01014
Defendant:
FKI Hardware, Inc., Hickory Hardware, Inc., Belwith International, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
State of Michigan and Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Lill et al v. Brasstech, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00295
Plaintiff:
James Lill, Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange, as subrogee of James Lill and Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange
Defendant:
Brasstech, Inc. d/b/a Newport Brass and Brasstech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IDS Property Casualty Ins. Co. v Kingstson Brass Inc.
as 2:2019cv11148
Plaintiff:
IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kingston Brass, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strickling v. Mueller Pension Plan et al
as 1:2016cv00203
Plaintiff:
Joan Strickling
Defendant:
Mueller Pension Plan and Mueller Brass
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Brass Rail, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv15008
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Brass Rail, LLC and Salman D. Yono
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Brass Rail, LLC
as 2:2012cv14655
Defendant:
Brass Rail, LLC and Salman D. Yono
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv13124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
American Copper & Brass, Inc. v. Lake City Industrial Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01162
Plaintiff:
American Copper & Brass, Inc.
Defendant:
Lake City Industrial Products, Inc. and Jeffrey Meeder
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on the use of telephone equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
