Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rowley v. State of New Mexico Human Services Department et al
as 1:2019cv00683
Defendant:
Robin Martin, Kristy Roybal, Taos County and others
Plaintiff:
H.L. Rowley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin S. et al v. Jacobson et al
as 1:2018cv00896
Plaintiff:
Michael J., Kevin S., Chris W. and others
Defendant:
Monique Jacobson and Brent Earnest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hatten-Gonzales v. Earnest
as 16-2064
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEBRA HATTEN-GONZALES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
BRENT EARNEST, Secretary of the New Mexico Human Services Department
Easter Seals El Mirador v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2015cv00739
Counter Defendant:
Easter Seals El Mirador
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, Human Services Department of the State of New Mexico, Brent Earnest and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Counseling Center, Inc. v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2015cv00652
Plaintiff:
Counseling Center, Inc.
Defendant:
State of New Mexico , Human Services Department of the State of New Mexico , Brent Earnest and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Border Area Mental Health Services, Inc. v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2015cv00651
Plaintiff:
Border Area Mental Health Services, Inc.
Defendant:
State of New Mexico , Human Services Department of the State of New Mexico , Brent Earnest and others
Counter_claimant:
Human Services Department of the State of New Mexico
Counter_defendant:
Border Area Mental Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hatten-Gonzales v. Earnest
as 1:1988cv00385
Plaintiff:
Debra Hatten-Gonzales
Defendant:
Brent Earnest
Miscellaneou:
Lawrence M Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
