Cases 21 - 30 of 57
FRANK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv78213
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN FRANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. County of Sherburne et al
as 0:2020cv01606
Defendant:
Mark Fritel, Pat Carr, County of Sherburne and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph Kendrick Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Carr et al
as 0:2020cv01505
Defendant:
Mark Fritel, Brian Frank, Bryan Bjergo and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Osiris Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRANKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv39016
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIANE FRANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRANK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv36012
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN FRANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. Carr et al
as 0:2020cv01086
Defendant:
Kachmarek Melissa, Mark Fritel, Brian Frank and others
Petitioner:
Tathony Mavdell Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Brott et al
as 0:2020cv00980
Defendant:
Captain Zerwas, Joel Brott, Andrea Kretch and others
Plaintiff:
Norris Deshon Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Sherburne County Jail et al
as 0:2020cv00506
Defendant:
Travis Lundstrom, Bryan Bjergo, Tyrel Hoppe and others
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. United States of America et al
as 0:2020cv00376
Respondent:
Joel Brott, U.S. Marshals Service, President Donald J. Trump and others
Petitioner:
Michael A. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Andrews v. United States of America et al
as 0:2019cv02732
Respondent:
Joel Brott, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Petitioner:
Norris Deshan Andrews and Norris Deshon Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
