Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Williams v. Smith
as 24-760
Petitioner:
STEPHEN J. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
DARYL NORVAL SMITH, in his individual capacity and in his capacity as a representative for the FAA administrator, JASON AUBREY GEORGE, in his official capacity as manager of the FAA Bradley Flight Standards District Office, now retired, BILLY JOE NOLEN, in his capacity as the acting administrator of the FAA and others
Caro Capital, LLC et al v. Koch et al
as 1:2020cv06153
Defendant:
Bedford Investment Partners, LLC, Kaizen Advisors LLC, Robert Koch and others
Plaintiff:
Caro Capital, LLC, Jupiter Wellness, Inc., Richard Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lb Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Karris v. Chappius
as 1:2015cv00957
Plaintiff:
Brian John Karris
Defendant:
Paul Chappius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karris v. Chappius
as 1:2015cv00757
Plaintiff:
Brian John Karris
Defendant:
Paul Chappius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karris v. Chappius
as 9:2015cv00962
Plaintiff:
Brian John Karris
Defendant:
Paul Chappius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karris v. Chappius
as 1:2015cv00671
Plaintiff:
Brian John Karris
Defendant:
Paul Chappius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karris v. Chappius et al
as 1:2015cv00599
Plaintiff:
Brian John Karris
Defendant:
Paul Chappius and Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karris v. Rodabaugh
as 1:2015cv00190
Plaintiff:
Brian John Karris
Defendant:
Rodabaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karris v. Varulo et al
as 2:2014cv01077
Plaintiff:
Brian John Karris
Defendant:
Thomas J. Spota, III, Ray Varulo and Gary J. Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Klemonski, Jr. v. Cournoyer
as 10-2302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin A. Klemonski, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Anne Cournoyer, Deputy Warden, WCCI, Sharon Thomas, (Jane Doe) Counselor Supv, WCCI, Brian, (John Doe) Mental Health Supv, WCCI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
