Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Jacob Andrew Bergeron v. Diane Davis et al
as 2:2021cv06340
Petitioner:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Respondent:
Dianne Davis, Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities, Georgia State Regional Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARGREAVES v. WARD et al
as 5:2021cv00257
Plaintiff:
CHAD HARGREAVES
Defendant:
GDC COMMISSONER TIMOTHY WARD, GOVERNOR BRIAN KEMP, JOHN OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIARRA v. KEMP et al
as 1:2021cv02789
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Defendant:
Hon. Brian Kemp, Chief of Police, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sims v. Kemp et al
as 4:2021cv00134
Plaintiff:
Bryan K. Sims
Defendant:
Gov. Brian Kemp, Department of Corrections, Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIARRA v. KEMP et al
as 4:2021cv00114
Plaintiff:
MOUSSA DIARRA
Defendant:
GOVERNOR BRIAN KEMP, CHIEF OF POLICE, JOE BIDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diarra v. Kemp
as 1:2021cv02656
Defendant:
Brian Kemp and Social Security Administration (SSA) Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LAWRENCE v. KEMP et al
as 5:2021cv00073
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR BOWEN, WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, LIEUTENANT KING and others
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Kemp et al
as 4:2021cv00055
Plaintiff:
Kevin G. Jones and George Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Damon T. Hininger, Commissioner, Chairman Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROSBIE v. KEMP et al
as 1:2021cv00030
Defendant:
BRIAN KEMP, CHRISTOPHER CARR, WARDEN MYERS and others
Plaintiff:
ERROL I CROSBIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrell v. Sheriff Fulton County et al
as 1:2020cv05298
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Sheriff, Fulton County and Governor Brian Kemp
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Morrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
