Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Lord v. Garland
as 5:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Lord
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bennett v. Unknown Defendants
as 7:2020cv00143
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Bennett
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Smith et al
as 7:2020cv00118
Respondent:
Daniel Stover, Beth Bartlett, Sgt. FNU Keeter and others
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Smith et al
as 6:2020cv00825
Defendant:
Daniel Stover, Assist. Warden M. Feazell, Warden FNU Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenewinkel et al v. Carvajal et al
as 3:2020cv02256
Plaintiff:
Jason Trott, William Cashel, Joshua N Higgins and others
Defendant:
L Smith, MD Carvajal, A Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattes v. Carvajal et al
as 3:2020cv01917
Plaintiff:
Brian M Mattes
Defendant:
Kevin McDermott, Dr Jennifer Caperton, MD Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. State of Texas
as 1:2020cv00531
Respondent:
State of Texas
Petitioner:
Brian M. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Landero v. Med Marketing Associates Inc et al
as 3:2018cv01305
Plaintiff:
James Landero
Defendant:
Med Marketing Associates Inc , Brian M Koslow , All Care Consultants Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association v. Spray et al
as 4:2015cv00624
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Anne Marie Spray, Shawn A Spray, Matthew C Spray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hadler et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv00001
Defendant:
Daniel T. Chang, M.D., U.S. Radiology On-Call, LLC and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Hadler, Douglas J. Hadler, Kevin D. Hadler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
