Cases 1 - 6 of 6
In Re: Moody's Corporation Sec
as 13-3754
Plaintiff:
Raphael Nach, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Lewis Wetstein, M.D. and Teamsters Local 282 Group
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Charles McCurley, Jr. and Teamsters Local 282 Pension Trust Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Linda S. Huber, Michael Kanef and Brian M. Clarkson
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Moody's Corporation and Raymond McDaniel, Jr.
In re Moody's Corporation Secu
as 13-3623
Plaintiff:
Raphael Nach, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Lewis Wetstein, M.D. and Teamsters Local 282 Group
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles McCurley, Jr. and Teamsters Local 282 Pension Trust Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Moody's Corporation, Linda S. Huber, Raymond McDaniel, Jr. and others
Danis v. Ernst & Young LLP et al
as 1:2011cv09001
Defendant:
Ernst & Young LLP , Moody's Corporation , Raymond W. McDaniel, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Danis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Danis v. Ernst & Young LLP et al
as 4:2011cv02055
Defendant:
Ernst & Young LLP , Moody's Corporation , Raymond W. McDaniel, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Danis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
In re: Moody's Corporation Sec
as 11-1468
Petitioner:
Charles McCurley, Jr., Teamsters Local 282 Pension Trust Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Wetstein
Respondent:
Moody's Corp., Linda S. Huber, Raymond McDaniel and others
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. McDaniel et al
as 1:2008cv09323
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Raymond W. McDaniel, Jr., John K. Wulff, Basil L. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
