Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Lunetta v. Amsberry
as 2:2020cv01508
Petitioner:
Nicholas Emilio Lunetta
Respondent:
Bridgette Amsberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richard Lowry v. Bridgett Amsberry
as 20-35649
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIDGETT AMSBERRY, Superintendent TRCI
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD THOMAS DENTON LOWRY
Kenneth Williams v. Michael Simon, et al
as 20-35550
Defendant:
JOHN KITZHABOR, ANDREW HALLMAN, MOHAMED AHMED, Prisoner and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE SHELTON, ODOC Health Serv. Mgr., FITZGERALD, C/O, RICK COURSEY, (EOCI) Supt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS
Orozco v. Norton et al
as 2:2020cv00316
Defendant:
Bridgett Amsberry, Troy Bowser, John Myrick and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Kelo Orozco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk Bauer v. Sue Washburn, et al
as 20-35090
Defendant / Appellee:
KELLY RATH, Oregon State Law Library Coordinator, Dome Building in Salem, WALKER, Captain, TOM LEMENS, Assistant Superintendent and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIRK MICHAEL BAUER
Defendant:
CAREY, MARY TANGNEY, DOME BUILDING, in Salem, Oregon and others
Johnson v. Peters et al
as 2:2019cv01578
Defendant:
Craig Prins, Bridgett Amsberry, Micheal Gower and others
Plaintiff:
Jayairus Joshua Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bauer v. Washburn et al
as 2:2019cv00655
Defendant:
Captain Frazier, Ms. Kelly Rath, Sue Washburn and others
Plaintiff:
Kirk Michael Bauer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Amsberry
as 2:2018cv01704
Respondent:
Bridgett Amsberry
Petitioner:
Francisco Almanza Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCaffery v. Amsberry
as 2:2018cv01590
Respondent:
Bridgette Amsberry
Petitioner:
David William McCaffery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Skaggs v. Bowser et al
as 6:2018cv01287
Respondent:
Bridgett Amsberry and Mr. Bowser
Petitioner:
Jason Douglas Skaggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
