Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Valentini v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00936
Plaintiff:
Rick Valentini
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Ibarra, Unknown Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Anderson v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation a, et al
as 22-15832
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN LYLE ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY, DAVID SHINN, Director, Director - ADCRR, JOSEPH PROFIRI, Deputy Director - ADCRR and others
Anderson v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry et al
as 2:2021cv00783
Defendant:
Gloria Mattice, Centurion Managed Care, Lance Hetmer and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Lyle Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mugleston v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02384
Defendant:
David Shinn, Centurian Managed Care, Gloria Mattice and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Mugleston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cammilletti v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02150
Defendant:
David Shinn, Centurian Managed Care, Gloria Mattice and others
Plaintiff:
Adolph Rocco Cammilletti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02147
Plaintiff:
Donovan Keith Newman
Defendant:
David Shinn, Centurian Managed Care, Carli Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02148
Plaintiff:
Damian Anthony-Lamar Taylor
Defendant:
David Shinn, Centurian Managed Care, Gloria Mattice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uselton v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02141
Defendant:
David Shinn, Centurian Managed Care, E Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
John Stevenson Uselton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meza v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv01381
Defendant:
Facility Health Administration, Corizon Medical Health, Centurion Medical Health and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Montano Meza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
