Cases 11 - 20 of 87
Bramber et al v. Herrera et al
as 1:2021cv04956
Plaintiff:
Marian Bramber, Reginald Bramber, J. Blair Craig and others
Defendant:
Ann J. Herrera, Esq., Dan Britt Jr. and Associates, Tiku & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRITT v. FORT et al
as 5:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL BRITT
Defendant:
KARL FORT and TIMOTHY WARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
6694 Dawson Blvd, LLC v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03625
Plaintiff:
6694 Dawson Blvd, LLC
Defendant:
Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., James Wallace Woods, Michael J. Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2021cv03138
Plaintiff:
David Lee Rogers, Jeffrey Brown, Jonathan Britt Lester and others
Defendant:
Ezell Brown, Newton County Sheriff's Office, HomeWav and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lancaster v. Britt et al
as 1:2021cv01448
Defendant:
Circle Star Insurance Company, a Risk Retention Group, Trisal Leasing Company, Inc. and Santana Britt
Plaintiff:
Mark Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Motor Vehicle
Seleme v. Britt et al
as 1:2021cv01283
Plaintiff:
Ana Seleme
Defendant:
Pat Salmon & Sons, Inc., Santana Britt, Trisal Leasing Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Britt v. Fort
as 1:2021cv01127
Petitioner:
David Britt
Respondent:
Karl Fort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Britt v. Mangum et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Unknown Other Officials, Janis G. Mangum, Jackson County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
David Earl Britt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britt v. Fort et al
as 1:2020cv05244
Plaintiff:
David Earl Britt
Defendant:
Commissioner Timothy Ward, Governor Brian Kemp and Warden Karl Fort
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
