Cases 31 - 40 of 261
Eduardo Navejar v. Deanna Brookhart
as 23-1742
Petitioner:
EDUARDO NAVEJAR
Respondent:
DEANNA BROOKHART, Warden
Jeryme Morgan v. Deanna Brookhart
as 23-1614
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERYME MORGAN
Respondent / Appellee:
DEANNA BROOKHART
Ealy v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Courtney Ealy
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart, Brown, Rob Jefferies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Romaris Walton
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Lorie Cunningham, Luking and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wester v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Wester
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart, Tiffanie Clark, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Brookhart et al
as 1:2023cv01441
Petitioner:
Raphael Hall and Rapheal Hall
Respondent:
Deanne M Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eitenmiller et al v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2023cv03050
Plaintiff:
Joshua Eitenmiller, Nina Eitenmiller, Gregory Gurski and others
Defendant:
Jay R Pritzker, Erin O'Boyle, Sarah Kerley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Charles v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Charles
Defendant:
Service List, Deanne M Brookhart, Kevin T. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kucinsky v. IDOC et al
as 3:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Charles Kucinsky
Defendant:
IDOC, Rob Jeffreys, Deann Brookhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brady v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Harley M Brady
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Rob Jeffries, DeeDee Brookhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
