Cases 11 - 20 of 261
Johnson v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv03744
Plaintiff:
Jerome R. Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Deanna Brookhart, Latoya Bayler and J. B. Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strange v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2023cv03303
Plaintiff:
Jason Strange
Defendant:
Jay R Pritzker, Illinois Department of Corrections, Erin O'Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Young v. Brookhart et al
as 1:2023cv16708
Petitioner:
Deshanta Young
Respondent:
Dee-Dee Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jesse Zuno v. Deanna Brookhart
as 23-3055
Petitioner / Appellant:
JESSE A. ZUNO
Respondent / Appellee:
DEANNA BROOKHART
Gardner v. Brookhart
as 3:2023cv03231
Petitioner:
DeShawn Gardner
Respondent:
Deanna M. Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shabazz v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
Malik Shabazz
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Letoya Hughes, Debbie Issacs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Galloway et al
as 3:2023cv03144
Plaintiff:
Ryishie Robinson
Defendant:
Galloway, Hille, Bradfor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brookhart v. LOreal USA Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06795
Plaintiff:
Nahida Brookhart
Defendant:
LOreal USA Inc., LOreal USA Products Inc., Soft-Sheen Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson v. Luking et al
as 3:2023cv03186
Plaintiff:
Johnny L. Wilson
Defendant:
Carissa Luking, Yoko Savino, A Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv02718
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Mitchell
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Rob Jeffreys, Dianna Brookhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
