Cases 41 - 50 of 1,840
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MITCHELL
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, C/O. PRICE, C/O. DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HIGGS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv23402
Plaintiff:
DONALD D. HIGGS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VICTORIA L. KUHN ESQ., M. CHERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWNE v. CHETIRKIN
as 2:2023cv23399
Petitioner:
MARK BROWNE
Respondent:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2023cv23324
Plaintiff:
MAYLON M. BROWN
Defendant:
EDWARD B. WILLIAMS and CATHERINE E. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
BROWN v. CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2023cv23075
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, POLICE OFFICER A. BENAVENTE, POLICE OFFICER O. RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. CREDIT ONE BANK
as 1:2023cv23008
Plaintiff:
DEON BROWN
Defendant:
CREDIT ONE BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv22962
Plaintiff:
AVIS BROWN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
HEICKLEN v. HOLLERAN et al
as 2:2023cv22649
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HEICKLEN
Defendant:
Kevin Holleran, STEPHEN J. FELICE, CHRISTOPHER F. BERTRAND and others
FERMAN v. SCOTT ETIAL et al
as 2:2023cv22559
Plaintiff:
EVIN FERMAN
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT ETIAL, BROWN and DILLIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
