Cases 1 - 10 of 13
ROSSMAN v. SEWELL et al
as 1:2020cv01425
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMAN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE N, WILLIAM LYKE, MIRIAM SEWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSSMAN v. WINGO et al
as 1:2020cv01155
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMAN
Defendant:
RICO HARRIS, JUDGE ELIZABETH WINGO, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossman v. Netanyahu et al
as 1:2017cv07802
Defendant:
Benjamin Netanyahu, The "Jews, John Doe-1 and others
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossman, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rossman v. Patterson et al
as 2:2017cv04854
Defendant:
Muriel Bowswer, John Doe-1, John Doe-2 and others
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rossman v. Scaramucci et al
as 1:2015cv09560
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossman
Defendant:
Anthony Scaramucci, John Doe-1, John Doe-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
Rossman v. Bell et al
as 1:2013cv08075
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossman
Defendant:
Susan Bell, Esqui, Polycom, Inc., Six Unknown Named Israeli Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rossman v. Darling
as 12-3717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brud Rossman
Defendant - Appellee:
David Darling, Chief of Police, Village of Catskill Police Department, Vincent Seeley, Trustee, Village of Catskill, New York, Thomas Spota, District Attorney, Suffolk County, New York and others
Sawtooth Capital LLC (SCLLC) v. Ellen Huvelle, et al
as 12-3452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAWTOOTH CAPITAL LLC (SCLLC), Managing Member Brud Rossman
Defendant:
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, U.S. District Judge for the District of Columbia, JOHN DOE, 1 and JOHN DOE, 2
Rossman v. Spota et al
as 2:2012cv00195
Defendant:
Richard Dorner, Martin Flatley, Claudette Grivaz and others
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rossman v. Darling et al
as 1:2011cv01469
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossman
Defendant:
David Darling, Vincent Seeley, Thomas Spota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
