Cases
Healy v. Miller et al
as 4:2024cv04053
Plaintiff: Bret Healy
Defendant: Charlene Miller, Patrick T. Smith, First Judicial Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Healy v. Fox et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv03004
Defendant: Larson, Sundall, Larson, Schaub and Fox PC, Brule County Abstract Company, Inc., Bryce Healy and others
Plaintiff: Bret Healy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
London v. Brule County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv04001
Plaintiff: Bonnie London
Defendant: Brule County , Buffalo County , Tory Engel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
London v. Miller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv04165
Plaintiff: Laura London
Defendant: Darrell Miller, Steve Smith, Scott Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greg Kroupa v. Peter Nielsen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2843
Plaintiff - Appellee: Greg Kroupa, guardian ad litem of B.K., a minor
Defendant - Appellant: Peter A. Nielsen, individually and in his official capacity as Assistant Director of 4-H Youth Development and Rod Geppert, individually and in his official capacity as Brule County Extension 4-H representative
Defendant: 4-H, a South Dakota Unincorporated Association, John Does and Mary Does, of the South Dakota 4-H Livestock Ethics Committee unidentified in any communication from the other Defendants or in the 2011 South Dakota 4-H Division Handbook of the South Dakota Cooperative Extension Service in their individual and official
Rolfes v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2008cv04049
Petitioner: Rebecca A. Rolfes
Respondent: State of South Dakota, Brule County Circuit Court, David V. Natvig and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?