Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lane v. Emanuel et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
JerXavier L Lane
Defendant:
Leon Emanuel, Charles Rex Scott, Paul D Carmouche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Go Auto Insurance Co et al
as 5:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Venza Turner
Defendant:
Go Auto Insurance Co, Judge Ramon Lafitte, Colvin Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. 1st Judicial District Court et al
as 5:2020cv01634
Defendant:
Roy Brun, Det Karum, Charles Ladado and others
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* NaKisha Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Brun et al
as 5:2019cv01006
Plaintiff:
NaKisha Jackson
Defendant:
Mike Spence, Roy L Brun, 1st Judicial District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Bruns v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv16246
Plaintiff:
Pamela Bruns
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruns v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
as 2:2017cv14211
Plaintiff:
Linda Bruns
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCall v. Brun et al
as 1:2015cv00088
Plaintiff:
Frank L McCall, Jr
Defendant:
Roy L Brun, Ramon Lafitte, Jennifer Clason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv02397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smith et al v. Regional Transit Authority et al
as 2:2012cv03059
Plaintiff:
Mary Smith , Pamela Bagneris Batiste , Robert Bookman and others
Defendant:
Regional Transit Authority and Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
