Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Antonelli et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11775
Plaintiff:
Kevin Comer, Wayne Wichern, Falamarz Youseflaleh and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Botwinick et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11762
Plaintiff:
George Braadt, Timothy Cagney, Michael Capolino and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv03698
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
The City of New York, Howard, Rafael Beato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01475
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Warren v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv00797
Defendant:
Correction Officer Brunner, City of New York, Correction Officer John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Young v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv03014
Defendant:
NYC Dept. Lieutenant Brunner, City of New York, John Does 1-6 and others
Plaintiff:
Jaska Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quito v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv03915
Plaintiff:
Edison Quito
Defendant:
City Of New York , Frances Brunner, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02482
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Armstrong et al v. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00489
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Armstrong , Douglas Aukema , Patricia A. Aukema and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC and Statoilhydro USA Onshore Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
