Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Clarke v. Newsom et al
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Eleni Kounalakis, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wales v. Corrections Corp of America et al
as 3:2009cv00247
Plaintiff:
Ray Wales
Defendant:
Corrections Corp of America, Christopher Aguirre, Chaplain Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Saddler v. Stolc
as 3:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Thomas R Saddler
Defendant:
Bruno Stolc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. 0.005 Acres of land, more or less,situated in the State of Alaska, and heirs of Mary E. Bahr and Kenneth Bahr (deceased) et al
as 3:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
0.005 Acres of land, more or less,situated in the State of Alaska, and heirs of Mary E. Bahr and Kenneth Bahr (deceased), George F. Bahr, Carol Peterson (deceased) and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Harry v. Stolc et al
as 3:2009cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Harry
Defendant:
Bruno Stolc, Corrections Corp of America and Alaska Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lewis v. Stolc
as 3:2009cv00045
Plaintiff:
Harry E. Lewis
Defendant:
Bruno Stolc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Starkweather et al v. Stolc et al
as 3:2009cv00009
Plaintiff:
Justin Starkweather and Lauri Starkweather
Defendant:
Bruno Stolc, Corrections Corp. of America Inc., State of Alaska Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Burton v. Stolc et al
as 3:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
Alan Burton
Defendant:
Bruno Stolc and Joseph D. Schmidt
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lewis v. Stolc
as 3:2008cv00253
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carson Lewis
Defendant:
Bruno Stolc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stavenjord v. Stolc
as 3:2008cv00223
Plaintiff:
Paul T. Stavenjord
Defendant:
Bruno Stolc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
