Cases 61 - 70 of 1,141
Patterson v. Collier
as 3:2023cv02495
Petitioner:
Dralon Duran Patterson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Burleson County, Texas et al
as 1:2023cv01368
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant:
Burleson County, Texas, Gene Hermes, Judge Reva L. Townslee Corbett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Foster
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palomo v. Collier
as 23-40636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reynaldo Palomo
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Evelyn Castro and others
Cobb v. Collier et al
as 7:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cobb
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden J Smith, Sr and Sgt. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birdow v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Austin D. Birdow
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and C.F. Hazlewood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaffney v. Collier
as 23-40622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Paul Sean Gaffney
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, April Zamora, Eric Pichardo and others
Cobb v. Collier et al;
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cobb
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ Bryan Collier, Warden J Smith, Sr and Sgt. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowley v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Michael Crowley
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Sammiego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Hayes et al
as 2:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Demenzia Montwell Mitchell
Defendant:
Bridgette Y Hayes, Chrystal W Wagner and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
