Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Buchanan v. Citibank, N.A.
as 1:2017cv00727
Plaintiff:
Hartly Buchanan
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Buchanan v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.,
as 1:2017cv00640
Plaintiff:
Hartly Buchanan
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, N.A.,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Buchanan v. Comenity Bank
as 1:2017cv00615
Plaintiff:
Hartly Buchanan
Defendant:
Comenity Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Pitkin et al v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02235
Defendant:
CJ Buchanan, Corizon Health, Inc., Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Pitkin and Russell Pitkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pitkin et al v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02230
Defendant:
CJ Buchanan, Corizon Health, Inc., Louisa Duru and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Pitkin and Russell Pitkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward et al v. Corizon Inc et al
as 3:2013cv02087
Defendant:
C. Allen, J. Barnes, J. Buchanan and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Andre Ward and Emma Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01425
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronald Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Buchanan v. Sima Cascade Village, LLC
as 6:2010cv06288
Plaintiff:
Chelsie Buchanan
Defendant:
Sima Cascade Village, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McDonald v. NORCOR et al
as 6:2009cv00416
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald
Defendant:
NORCOR, Laura Pryor, Larry Lindhorst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Kollman et al
as 1:2008cv03027
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daryl J Kollman, Martha C. Carpenter, Klamath County and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
