Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hills v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland and Maury County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Roland et al
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Ronald Brown
Defendant:
Sheriff Bucky Roland and Maury County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Covell v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Joshua Covell
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, f/n/u Maddox, Donnie Tilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farris v. Maury County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Carlos M. Farris
Defendant:
Maury County Jail, Trinity Food Services, f/n/u Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewer v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah D. Brewer
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, J. Bailey, f/n/u Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Covell et al v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Joshua M. Covell, Cameron Malugin, Chuck Whitehead and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Joey Parks, Jeff Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irizarry v. Rowland
as 3:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Mario De'Angelo Irizarry
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammock v. Rowland et al
as 1:2021cv00060
Plaintiff:
Cody James Hammock
Defendant:
Sheriff Bucky Rowland and Maury County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00029
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Maury County Sheriffs Department Jail, Kellwell Food Management and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Roberts Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
