Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Martinez v. Back Bone Bullies, et al
as 22-1201
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FRANCISCO JAVIER MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellant:
BACK BONE BULLIES LTD., BROOKE SKILLO and GABE SKILLO
Back Bone Bullies, et al v. Francisco Martinez
as 22-703
Petitioner:
BACK BONE BULLIES LTD., BROOKE SKILLO and GABE SKILLO
Respondent:
FRANCISCO JAVIER MARTINEZ
Martinez v. Back Bone Bullies, et al
as 22-1112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCISCO JAVIER MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
BACK BONE BULLIES LTD., BROOKE SKILLO and GABE SKILLO
Martinez v. Back Bone Bullies LTD. et al
as 1:2021cv01245
Defendant:
Brooke Skillo, Gabe Skillo and Back Bone Bullies LTD.
Plaintiff:
Francisco Javier Martinez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Viacom International, Inc v. Baca et al
as 1:2018cv00112
Plaintiff:
Viacom International, Inc
Defendant:
Mark Anthony Baca and Guardian Anti-Bullying Campaign, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bullis et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 1:2008cv02493
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey (I) G. Bullis, Jeffrey G. Bullis, Alan (I) Dillsaver and others
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co., Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bullis v. Independent School District No. 2 of Delaware County, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2007cv00054
Plaintiff:
Michale D Bullis
Defendant:
Independent School District No. 2 of Delaware County, Oklahoma, Tom Steen, Mike Teel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Initiative Referendu, et al v. Walker et al, et al
as 2:2000cv00837
Plaintiff:
Utah Environmental Congress, All Plaintiffs, David M. Jones and others
Amicus Curiae:
Ken Jones, Mike Styler, Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife and others
Defendant:
Olene S. Walker, Mark Shurtleff and Janet C. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
