Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Ramirez et al v. Flowers Foods, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv05130
Plaintiff:
Fernando Ramirez , Ivan Bundy , Norman Suhovy and others
Defendant:
Flowers Foods, Inc. , Flowers Baking Co. of California , Flowers Baking Company of Modesto, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
United States of America v. Kernen Construction et al
as 2:2017cv01424
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kernen Construction and Bundy & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
United States of America v. Kernen Construction et al
as 2:2017at00697
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kernen Construction and Bundy & Sons, Inc. dba Bundy & Sons Logging
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Wilson v. Fox et al.
as 2:2015cv02108
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
Robert W Fox, Brian Duffy, D. Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bundy v. Malnove Incorporated of Utah et al
as 3:2015cv03899
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bundy
Defendant:
Malnove Incorporated of Utah and Malnove Holding Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Haskell v. Garret, et al
as 2:2015cv00750
Plaintiff:
Ruth Haskell
Defendant:
Jeff Garret, Todd Bottke, Dave Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raley v. Williams et al
as 2:2014cv02652
Plaintiff:
Stephen Raley
Defendant:
Bob Williams, Burt Bundy, Steve Chamblin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bundy v. Premera Blue Cross et al
as 3:2013cv01130
Plaintiff:
Pamela K. Bundy
Defendant:
Premera Blue Cross , Group Plan and Plan Administrator
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Deborah L Bundy v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2012cv01052
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Deborah L Bundy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
