Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Alward v. Newell et al
as 1:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Alward
Defendant:
Brian Newell, Warden Healey, Elkton FSL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. Bureau of Prisons, RRM Cincinnati, Residential Reentry Office
as 1:2022cv00589
Petitioner:
Michael H Ingram
Respondent:
RRM Cincinnati and Bureau of Prisons, RRM Cincinnati, Residential Reentry Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yang v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2022cv03217
Petitioner:
Sung S. Yang
Respondent:
Alvis House and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barrett v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2022cv03218
Plaintiff:
Anthony C Barrett
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vostatek v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2022cv03158
Petitioner:
Franklin Vostatek
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turner v. Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2018cv00484
Petitioner:
John Louis Turner, Jr.
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Howell v. Reams et al
as 1:2014cv00796
Plaintiff:
Danny C Howell
Defendant:
Reams, Baker and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montes-Montes v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2011cv00087
Petitioner:
Jaime Montes-Montes
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Keith Russell Judd v. Lappin et al
as 2:2010cv00731
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Attorney General of New Mexico, et al., Respondents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riches v. Tellem et al
as 3:2008cv00235
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Arn Tellem and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
