Cases 21 - 30 of 167
SWINTON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2020cv00050
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and FCI LORETTO
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. SWINTON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SANTANIELLO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 3:2020cv00037
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
RALPH SANTANIELLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RODRIGUEZ v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2020cv00032
Respondent:
THE GEO GROUP, INC. and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
LEONARDO LLERAS RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SIMPSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 3:2020cv00009
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN OF CANAAN USP, IAN CONNORS, C. GOMEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RIZK v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2019cv00164
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and V. MOSER, WARDEN
Petitioner:
MOHAMMED RIZK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BURMAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR et al
as 3:2019cv00123
Plaintiff:
ALLAH BURMAN
Defendant:
KOPERA MEDICAL STAFF, ERIC BRADLEY, IAN CONNORS and others
Petitioner:
DONALD N. DAVEY and TIMICO C. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 3:2019cv00119
Respondent:
DIRECTOR MATHEW ALBENCE, DIRECTOR HUGH J. HURWITZ, SECRETARY KEVIN MCALEENAN and others
Petitioner:
LEONARDO LLERAS RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2019cv00172
Petitioner:
LARRY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LATHAM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv00154
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. ATTORNEY - WD - PA and WARDEN OF FCI MCKEAN
Petitioner:
ERIC T. LATHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv00093
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and LT. K. BACOTE
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
