Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Tarrer v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2010cv05154
Petitioner:
Larry Edward Tarrer
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fjerstad v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv01270
Plaintiff:
Michael B Fjerstad
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Theresa Talplacido and Harlan Penn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Michael Howard Hunter
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons and William H Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dayan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv00406
Plaintiff:
Edward Dayan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and Attorney General of the U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vega v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2009cv05076
Petitioner:
Juan D Vega, Jr
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Community Corrections Manager
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01441
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Riches v. Randolph et al
as 2:2008cv00220
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Willie Randolph, Omar Minaya, Fred Wilpon and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Netspend Corp et al
as 2:2008cv00211
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Netspend Corp, MPower Ventures LP, Grupo Omnilife SA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riches v. Constanza ETRO et al
as 2:2008cv00182
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Constanza ETRO, Kean ETRO and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farnsworth v. Palmquist et al
as 2:2008cv00820
Plaintiff:
Charles V Farnsworth
Defendant:
Robert J. Palmquist and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
