Cases 1 - 10 of 529
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bosselman et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv03316
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Bosselman, Carrie Coakley, Van McClees and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Rodriguez v. Burke et al
as 1:2024cv02715
Petitioner:
Andres Rodriguez
Respondent:
James M. Burke and D. Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
as 1:2024cv01479
Plaintiff:
Taryne Burke and Ashton Burke
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Hall et al
as 9:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Larry Davis
Defendant:
Kristen Hall, Timothy Kijowski, M. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beardsley et al v. County of Saratoga
as 1:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
Brendan Beardsley, Nicole Hollner, Susan Traver and others
Defendant:
County of Saratoga
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Doyle v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2023cv08871
Plaintiff:
Robert Doyle
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, James Burke, Thomas Spota and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Burke v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2023cv01249
Plaintiff:
Michael Burke
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Wynne et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv09955
Plaintiff:
Willis Wynne, Jonathan De Crescenzo, Scott Konig and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
